Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
Print this page Email this page Users Online: 790
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2015  |  Volume : 4  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 97-102

Evaluation of treatment changes produced by different orthodontic treatment modalities using Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index


1 Department of Orthodontics, Meghna Institute of Dental Sciences, Nizamabad, India
2 Department of Pedodontics, Kamineni Institute of Dental Sciences, Narketpally, Nalgonda, Telangana, India

Correspondence Address:
Seena Naik Eslavath
Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Meghna Institute of Dental Sciences, Nizamabad, Andhra Pradesh
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2277-8632.158584

Rights and Permissions

Background: The assessment of treatment outcome has been an important facet of the orthodontic specialty for several decades. Generally, the orthodontic outcome is graded subjectively or by some objective method of evaluation in the clinical setting or of the study groups. The individual grading of one's own treatment results can be a self-educating exercise to improve the quality of care. Unfortunately, the variation in the criteria used by different orthodontists makes it difficult to compare the results Materials and Methods: A sample of 150 treated cases was divided into three groups as follows: Group A (n = 50) treated with edgewise mechanotherapy, Group B (n = 50) treated with light wire mechanotherapy, and Group C (n = 50) treated with functional appliance therapy. All the three groups were analyzed using Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index. The degree of improvement in each case was categorized into three as worse-no improvement, improved, and greatly improved. Statistical analysis used: Chi-square test was used for comparison within groups and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for comparing treatment improvement between groups. Results: All the three groups showed significant overall improvement after treatment. However, the patients in edgewise group demonstrated greater degree of overall improvement in comparison to the rest. Conclusions: The PAR index appeared to be sensitive enough to determine the difference in outcome between the techniques used in this study.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2308    
    Printed32    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded225    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal