Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
Print this page Email this page Users Online: 265
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 5  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 183-186

Item analysis of multiple choice questions of undergraduate pharmacology examinations in an International Medical School in India


Department of Pharmacology, Melaka Manipal Medical College (MMMC), Manipal University, Manipal, Karnataka, India

Correspondence Address:
Yeshwanth Rao Karkal
Department of Pharmacology, Melaka Manipal Medical College (MMMC), Manipal University, Manipal - 576 104, Karnataka
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2277-8632.191842

Rights and Permissions

Background: Item analysis is widely used to improve test quality by observing the characteristics of a particular item and this can hence be used to ensure that questions are of an appropriate standard for inclusion in a test. Hence, this study to evaluate the multiple choice questions of an undergraduate pharmacology program. Materials and Methods: A total of 488 items were randomly selected and subjected to item analysis. Facility value (FV) and discrimination index (DI) were calculated by applying the appropriate formulae with the help of MS Excel. Results: The overall mean FV (difficulty index) and DI was 56.64% (±2.36) (mean range: 23.89-71.25%) and 0.22 (±0.84) (mean range: 0.16-0.44), respectively. 71.09% of the items analyzed were found to be “good/optimal” items based on the FV (14.13% — optimal, 56.96% — good) and 36.26% of the items analyzed were found be “very/reasonably” good items based on the DI (20.49% — very good, 15.77% — reasonably good). The number of “poor” items was 22.95% based on the FV and 18.23% based on the DI. When both the parameters were considered together, only 23% of the items were found to be “good” and 17.11% were found to be “poor.” Pearson correlation between the two indices showed a negative correlation (but statistically insignificant) between these two indices (r = −0.001379, P= 0.9774). Conclusion: Item analysis when regularly incorporated can help to develop a very useful, valid and a reliable question bank.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2722    
    Printed12    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded260    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal