Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
Print this page Email this page Users Online: 6434

 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2022  |  Volume : 11  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 6-10

Appraisal of root-crown ratio of maxillary incisors in various skeletal and dental malocclusions


1 Department of Orthodontics, Vishnu Dental College, Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India
2 Department of Community and Children's Oral Health Care, The International Medical University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Date of Submission17-Dec-2020
Date of Decision25-Mar-2021
Date of Acceptance31-Mar-2021
Date of Web Publication23-May-2022

Correspondence Address:
Dr. G V D Harsha
Department of Orthodontics, Vishnu Dental College, Bhimavaram - 534 202, Andhra Pradesh
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jdrntruhs.jdrntruhs_205_20

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Background: Shortening of the dental roots denoted by a decrease in root-crown ratio is a common manifestation of root resorption. Several natural conditions place roots at risk of resorption without any pathology. To date, information regarding root resorption in sagittal malocclusions is deplete in the literature.
Aims: To measure and associate the root-crown ratio of maxillary incisors in different malocclusions.
Methods: About 85 patients were allocated to three groups, Skeletal and Angle's Class I, Class II and Class III. Panoramic radiographs and periapical radiographs for maxillary incisors (340 teeth) using paralleling technique were taken and traced. Length of the root and crown were assessed and root-crown ratios were calculated.
Results: The root-crown ratio was significantly lower in Skeletal and Angle's Class III group (P < 0.05) compared to Classes I and II groups. Gender predilection was found to be absent.
Conclusion: Root resorption of maxillary incisors was observed in Skeletal and Angle's Class III patients. Maxillary central incisors were observed to have decreased root-crown ratios compared to maxillary lateral incisors irrespective of malocclusion.

Keywords: Class III malocclusion, maxillary incisors, root-crown ratio


How to cite this article:
Harsha G V, Padma Priya C V, Arunachalam SK, Varma D P, Chakravarthy V G, Manda A. Appraisal of root-crown ratio of maxillary incisors in various skeletal and dental malocclusions. J NTR Univ Health Sci 2022;11:6-10

How to cite this URL:
Harsha G V, Padma Priya C V, Arunachalam SK, Varma D P, Chakravarthy V G, Manda A. Appraisal of root-crown ratio of maxillary incisors in various skeletal and dental malocclusions. J NTR Univ Health Sci [serial online] 2022 [cited 2022 Jul 2];11:6-10. Available from: https://www.jdrntruhs.org/text.asp?2022/11/1/6/345802




  Introduction Top


External apical root resorption is defined as the loss of apical root tissue. It causes the shortening of the dental roots which is implicated by a decrease in the root-crown ratio. Uslu et al.[1] found that there was an association between short roots and malocclusion. A study by Uehara et al.[2] dictated that malocclusion itself was a risk factor for shortening of roots. Literature on root resorption dictated that treated Class II malocclusions exhibited root resorption.[3]

Anatomic details like root form and size, heavy masticatory forces, occlusal trauma due to premature contacts and gender have been reported to influence the root resorption.[4] Moreover, among all teeth, maxillary incisors were reported with greater incidence of root resorption among all teeth.[5]

So, knowing the etiology and assessing root resorption is important prior to the start of orthodontic treatment. This article aimed to assess the root-crown ratio of maxillary incisors in sagittal skeletal and dental malocclusions with no history of orthodontic treatment to assess root resorption.


  Materials and Methods Top


The subjects comprised of healthy patients of age range between 12 and 35 years, with Skeletal and Angle's Classes I, II and III malocclusions with full complement of dentition. Patients who enrolled for the treatment at Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics department were included. Ethical clearance with the Institutional Review Board (IRB) no. VDC/IEC/2014-08 was granted by the Ethical committee was obtained dated- 21/01/2014.

Methodology

Before commencing the actual study, a pilot study was carried out to check feasibility and to estimate the sample size. Based on the findings of the pilot study, the actual sample size was found to be 85 patients. Patients who had a previous history of orthodontic treatment, history of trauma and patients with dental anomalies like impaction, agenesis, dilaceration, fusion, gemination and craniofacial syndromes, cleft lip and palate patients were excluded from the study. Patients with periodontitis, attrition, bruxism and systemic disorders like diabetes, bronchial asthma, allergy, thyroid and parathyroid disorders were eliminated from the study. The study was well explained to the subjects.

Procedure

After the initial examination, lateral cephalographs were obtained and traced to assess the skeletal morphology [Table 1]. Based on the inclusion criteria and sample size estimation, 45, 25 and 15 patients for Skeletal and Angle's Classes I, II and III groups, respectively, were included. Panoramic radiographs and periapical radiographs for maxillary incisors using paralleling technique were obtained for all the patients before initiation of the orthodontic treatment. All the radiographs were obtained from the same radiographic machine with a magnification of 10% to rule out the magnification error.
Table 1: Cephalometric Measurements for All Groups

Click here to view


Permanent maxillary incisors were traced with a tip measuring 0.5 mm on acetate sheets using 10× magnification lens from periapical radiographs and panoramic radiographs and points like root apex point (a), cemento-enamel junction (b) and incisal edge point (c) were marked [Figure 1]. The length of the root and crown of maxillary incisors were assessed from panoramic and periapical radiographs by using 'Method of Lind'.[6] For measuring the root-crown ratio, three parallel reference lines were drawn on the basis of the points traced. Crown height (C) was measured along the perpendicular lines, from line 'b' to line 'c' and root length (RL) was measured along the perpendicular lines, from line 'a' to line 'b' using digital Vernier caliper (Mitutoyo, Japan). The root-crown ratio of an individual tooth was calculated by dividing the root length by the crown length (RL/C).
Figure 1: a-b = Root length (RL). b-c = Crown height (c). Root-crown ratio = RL: C

Click here to view


Statistical analysis

Statistical tests were performed using conventional SPSS 21 statistical analysis software (IBM SPSS statistics for Windows, Version 21.0 Armonk, NY, IBM Corp). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post hoc Tukey tests were used for measuring the mean variation of the root-crown ratio between Classes I, II and III groups. The differences in the mean root-crown ratio among variables like gender and between Class II div 1 and 2 were assessed by unpaired t-test.

Method error

To assess intra-examiner reproducibility and reliability of the measurements, all radiographs were retraced at an interval of 2 months.[7] To assess the inter-examiner reliability 10% of the total patient radiographs were retraced. Kappa statistics was applied to determine any differences.


  Results Top


Among all malocclusions, the root-crown ratios of the maxillary incisors in Skeletal and Angle's Class III (mean = 1.25) were significantly (P < 0.05) lesser than Class I and Class II groups (mean of Class I = 1.45, mean of Class II = 1.58) [Table 2]. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the root-crown ratio between Division 1 and Division 2 of Class II malocclusion [Table 3]. The males and females exhibited similar root resorption and there was no gender predilection [Table 4].
Table 2: One Way Anova for Comparison of Root-Crown Ratio among The Three Groups

Click here to view
Table 3: Unpaired T- Test for Comparison of Root Crown Ratio between Class II DIV 1 & DIV 2 Groups.

Click here to view
Table 4: Unpaired T- Test for Comparison of Root Crown Ratio between Male and Female

Click here to view


Inter-examiner reliability and intra-examiner reliability showed agreement with values of 0.80 and 0.86, respectively.


  Discussion Top


Root resorption is directly proportional to the root-crown ratio which implicates that a decrease in the root-crown ratio represents the presence of root resorption. The root-crown ratios were chosen instead of linear measurements like root and crown lengths because ratios were unaffected by radiographic proportional changes.[8] The present study demonstrated that Skeletal and Angle's Class III malocclusion group exhibited the least root-crown ratios compared to the other groups which implies that root resorption was found in Skeletal and Angle's Class III malocclusion. Also, Class I group exhibited lower root-crown ratios than Class II group, but were not statistically significant. Within Class II malocclusion group, no significant differences of root-crown ratio between Division 1 and Division 2 were observed. On observation, maxillary central incisors had decreased root-crown ratios compared to maxillary lateral incisors irrespective of malocclusion.

The present study revealed decreased root-crown ratio in Skeletal and Angle's Class III malocclusions. A possible explanation could be owed to skeletal malformation. Fernandez et al.[9] elucidated that certain dental anomalies could be specific for some skeletal malocclusion patterns and they share similar genetic contributions. Also, one more reason could be a possible disturbance during odontogenesis.

Arntsen et al.[10] noted that the lengths of maxillary incisors were affected in Class III malocclusion prior to the orthodontic treatment. They studied root resorption in various skeletal malocclusions and assessed in profile radiographs. There could be possible overlapping of all incisors in the profile radiographs. So, panoramic radiographs and periapical radiographs with paralleling technique were opted for the assessment in this study.

Literature on root resorption dictated that patients with open-bite malocclusion were at risk for root resorption.[11] Tongue thrusting may be a possible etiological factor of root resorption in the open-bite patients where detrimental forces were applied by the tongue. The presence of more number of open bites in the Class III sample compared to the other groups may also be responsible for the decrease in the root-crown ratios in Class III group.

Association between root resorption and gender was also assessed. A negative correlation of gender and root resorption was found in the present study. Various studies found a positive correlation for gender predilection where females were reported to have more root resorption compared to males (Massler and Perreault, 1954; Newman, 1975).[12],[13]

Root resorption is directly correlated to the age of the individual and increases with an increase in age.[13] The present study included patients with the age of 12-35 years because complete root formation of maxillary lateral incisors takes place by 12 years.

The present study suggests that shorter dental roots were found in Skeletal and Angle's Class III than other patients with various malocclusions. The findings of this study are considered to be important for orthodontic diagnosis and treatment. As various studies dictate that root resorption depends on the type, technique and force levels of orthodontic treatment;[14],[15] so, Class III malocclusion can be considered as a risk factor for root resorption and should be assessed thoroughly prior to orthodontic treatment. Diagnostic aids, such as 3D imaging techniques like computed tomography and cone beam computed tomography, are more likely to help for detecting the resorption lacunae.


  Conclusion Top


  • Patients with Skeletal and Angle's Class III had an unfavorable root-crown ratio for maxillary incisors compared to Skeletal and Angle's Class I and Class II groups.
  • Root resorption did not show any gender predilection.
  • Maxillary central incisors were observed to have decreased root-crown ratios compared to maxillary lateral incisors irrespective of malocclusion.


So, these factors should be kept in mind before starting the orthodontic treatment in various malocclusions, which exhibited resorption even before the start of the orthodontic treatment.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Uslu O, Akcam MO, Evirgen S, Cebeci I. Prevalence of dental anomalies in various malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2009;135:328-35.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Uehara S, Maeda A, Tomonari H, Miyawaki S. Relationships between the root-crown ratio and the loss of occlusal contact and high mandibular plane angle in patients with open bite. Angle Orthod 2013;83:36-42.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Brin I, Tulloch JF, Koroluk L, Philips C. External apical root resorption in Class II malocclusion: A retrospective review of 1- versus 2-phase treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2003;124:151-6.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Sodawala J, Reddy R. Root resorption in orthodontics: A review of literature. Ind J Dent Res Rev 2011;47-9.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Al-Qawasmi RA, Hartsfield JK, Everett ET, Flury L, Liu L, Foroud TM, et al. Genetic predisposition to external apical root resorption in orthodontic patients: Linkage of chromosome-18 marker. J Dent Res 2003;82:356-60.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Lind V. Short root anomaly. Scand J Dent Res 1972;80:85-93.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Dahlberg G. Statistical Methods for Medical and Biological Students. London, UK: Allen and Unwin; 1940.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Brook AH, Holt RD. The relationship of crown length to root length in permanent maxillary central incisors. Proc Br Paedod Soc 1978;8:17-20.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Fernandez CC, Pereira CV, Luiz RR, Vieira AR, Costa MD. Dental anomalies in different growth and skeletal malocclusion patterns. Angle Orthod 2018;88:195-201.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Arntsen T, Kjaer I, Sonnesen L. Lengths of the maxillary central incisor, the nasal bone, and the anterior cranial base in different skeletal malocclusions. Acta Odontol Scand 2009;67:265-70.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Harris EF, Butler ML. Patterns of incisor root resorption before and after orthodontic correction in cases with anterior open bites. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992;101:112-9.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Massler M, Perreault J. Root resorption in the permanent teeth of young adults. J Dent Child 1954;21:158-64.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Newman WG. Possible etiologic factors in external root resorption. Am J Orthod 1975;67:522-39.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Mavragani M. A radiographic comparison of apical root resorption after orthodontic treatment with a standard edgewise and a straight-Wire edgewise. Eur J Orthod 2000;22:665-74.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Owman Moll P, Kurol J. The effects of a fourfold increased orthodontic force magnitude on tooth movement and root resorptions. An intra-individual study in adolescents. Eur J Orthod 1996;18:287-94.  Back to cited text no. 15
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Me...
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed246    
    Printed10    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded39    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal